Why
nets work: Kellogg professor explores collaboration's power
Kellogg
World
asked Brian
Uzzi, professor of management and organizations and a
scholar of network theory, how staying connected can create
surprising value.
Kellogg
World: There's an intuitive sense that networking is important,
but just how critical can it be? In your research what are
the benefits you have seen for those who take networking seriously?
Brian
Uzzi: Pathbreaking research into social networks has shown
that they prefigure in lots of important human achievements.
Just a sampling of the research shows that after you net out
individual characteristics associated with success, such as
talent and education, persons with more powerful networks
are more creative, better problem solvers, more likely to
have clout in selling new ideas, get better pricing on their
loans, and enjoy higher salaries and upward mobility. Networks
have been shown to affect what life-saving new drugs get adopted,
the effectiveness of police officers' crime fighting and who
lives longer. The next step is to understand how networks
shape entire communities and collective action.This is one of the reasons why MySpace.com and
blogging fascinates business people. If you can unlock the
secret of network structure in these communities, it could
help you forecast the next big thing or understand what markets
are most likely to buy your soap.
KW:
How can people improve the effectiveness of their networks?
Brian
Uzzi: When many people think of their networks, they think
of who they know. This makes sense and is to some degree valid.
A crucial observation lost on the casual observer is that
networks are also about what you do. People who get involved
in shared activities that cut across a broad demographic range
build powerful networks because they get diversity of ideas
and resources while building strong ties. By contrast, most
people build networks low in social capital by populating
their networks with people with similar backgrounds, training
and ways of making inferences similar to their own.
KW:
What misconceptions about networking have you encountered
in your research?
Brian
Uzzi: Lots of people think of networking as schmoozing
and pretending to be friends. They think of mixers and handing
out business cards or getting a "rubbing elbows"
photo with a celebrity. While this can happen, it is not what
networks are about. Networks are about building value for
everyone by building on differences that complement each other.
They are about giving before receiving. This might sound Pollyanna-ish,
but research shows it works.
KW:
Do we yet have a full appreciation for social capital's power,
or will additional study reveal even more surprises?
Brian
Uzzi: One of the most exciting things about this area
is its explosiveness. What makes a theory powerful is its
ability to explain lots of different things and to continue
to explain new, important phenomena. In the last 10 years,
network theory has migrated from sociology to nearly all disciplines
where it appears to be gobbling up explanations for a range
of new (and old) social, economic and biological phenomena.
Five years ago, few would have thought that a firm's profits,
or the efficiency of the Web, or metabolic pathways of proteins,
or a person's success in science, art and industry would have
one key thing in common: networks.