|
|
|
©
Matthew Gilson
Mort
Kamien, the Joseph and Carol Levy Distinguished
Professor of Entrepreneurship |
|
|
Faculty
Forum
Revolutionary Innovation
What will it be and when will it get here?
Essay
by Mort Kamien, the Joseph and Carole Levy Distinguished Professor
of Entrepreneurship
In 1798,
Thomas Malthus’ “Essay on the Principles of
Population” hypothesized that because population
grows at a geometric rate while the food supply grows only
at an arithmetic rate, it is inevitable that food demand
will eventually outstrip food supply, reducing humanity
to the edge of subsistence. Malthus’ prediction proved
spectacularly wrong. However, we may not be out of the
woods yet. Martin Rees, Britain’s Astronomer Royal,
tells us that humanity only has a 50 percent chance of
surviving to the end of this century, for reasons that
include the World Wildlife Fund’s estimate that it
will take the resources of three earths to support the
8 billion people who are expected to inhabit the planet
by 2050 [1].
The reason Malthus
got it so wrong was he underestimated the role of technological
advances despite having witnessed
the Industrial Revolution. He didn’t foresee the continual
innovations over the next 200 years. We, on the other hand,
have become so accustomed to the new, new thing that we take
for granted that whatever the challenge, innovation and invention
will meet it even if it’s the need for the resources
of three earths.
After
all, in 1925 the eminent philosopher Alfred North Whitehead
proclaimed, “The
great invention of the nineteenth century was the invention
of the method of invention.” [2]
To which in 1952 the economist John Kenneth
Galbraith added, “Because development is costly, it
follows that it can be carried out only by a firm that has
the resources associated with considerable size.” [3]
Think Bell Laboratories.
Apparently
Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak hadn’t read Galbraith.
They kicked off the information technology revolution by
assembling desktop computers in a garage. But IT, according
to the Harvard Business Review [4], has
run its course by being absorbed into the business infrastructure
much as earlier information technologies had, leaving us
with the big question “What’s next?” Where
is the next revolution that will generate jobs, instant
millionaires and budget surpluses going to come from — and
when will it get here? Many gurus are eager to tell us,
but there is a Catch-22: “Those who know, don’t
speak; those who speak, don’t know.” Think
plastics.
Regardless of where the innovation comes from and when,
for it to be revolutionary it will have to be embodied in
a piece of equipment that provides businesses that possess
it a competitive advantage. Production to meet widespread
demand for it will generate new jobs and the other goodies.
There is a story
of an airliner whose navigation system failed. Its captain
announced to the passengers that he had
good news and bad news. The bad news was that he didn’t
know where they were heading, but the good news was that
they were making great time. And so it is with innovation.
Current low interest rates force investors looking for higher
returns to assume more risk, while job scarcity reduces the
opportunity cost of striking out on one’s own. With
so many fresh entrepreneurs eager to succeed, we may not
know exactly where innovations are heading, but we are confident
that they are making great time.
1
Martin Rees, Our Final Hour, New York: Basic Books, 2003 back
2
Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, New
York: Macmillan, 1925 back
3
John Kenneth Galbraith, American Capitalism, Boston:
Houghton Mifflin, 1952 back 4
Nicholas G. Carr, "IT Doesn't Matter," Harvard
Business Review, May 2003, 41-9. back
|